Next: Dome seeing
Up: Engineering criteria and
Previous: Wind turbulence on
The surface figure of the relatively thin primary mirrors of
the new 8-m generation are quite sensitive to the turbulent pressure
fluctuations caused by wind buffeting. For instance in the case of
the VLT, the relationship
(
) leads to specify, for a wavefront error of
200 nanometers, a threshold for
the admissible pressure fluctuation at 1.3 Pa. This is a very low value
that will generally be reached with a wind speed close to the mirror
of about 3 m/s.
From the practical engineering standpoint
there are in principle three possible technical solutions to this
problem:
- Passive solution through wind shielding.
Here the enclosure must be capable of shielding the mirror from
nearly all wind loading. This is the approach taken by the VLT project,
where the relationships (
) and (
) will
allow the designers to relate the airflow speed near the
mirror with the
pressure fluctuations, thereby providing the quantitative
data for evaluating the
optical performance of the mirror under wind loads and then for
determining the best operating strategy for
the venting devices (windscreen, louvers) of the enclosure.
This topic will be further discussed in section 6.2 below.
The other alternatives require the upgrading of
"active optics" mirror support systems in order to provide a
reaction capability of the mirror to fluctuating wind loads.
- Increasing the number of virtual fix-points.
This approach has been taken in particular by the Gemini project
(see page
), where it is planned to provide the
mirror with six fix-points instead of three. This will reduce the
mirror deflections, hence the optical aberrations by a factor of about
four.
- Increasing the bandwidth of the active optics control
loop.
We have seen that the peak frequency of the pressure fluctuations on
a 8-m mirror is below 1 Hz in all the configurations tested.
Therefore
an extension of the active optics control loop up to at least 1 Hz,
which appears technically feasible [Wilson 93], would achieve
a sufficient dynamic correction of the effect of wind buffeting.
Clearly, while the first alternative is completely within the design
domain of the enclosure engineer, the other two will require a
concurrent approach, in which the development of improved active
optics systems is driven by a parametric analysis of the amplitude
and frequencies of pressure fluctuations on the mirror, performed
along the lines illustrated in section
.
Next: Dome seeing
Up: Engineering criteria and
Previous: Wind turbulence on
Lorenzo Zago, lorenzo.zago@heig-vd.ch,
Mon Nov 6 23:33:14 GMT+0100 1995