next up previous contents
Next: Wind buffeting on Up: Engineering criteria and Previous: Engineering criteria and

Wind turbulence on the telescope

Fig. 6.1 shows a comparison of the amplitude of of rms pressure fluctuations acting on the upper part of an 8-meter telescope in various enclosure configurations. The additional turbulence created by the slit is significant only for azimuth angles < 40. In principle, the presence of a 50% permeability windscreen across the slit can provide conditions on the telescope in which the overall rms amplitude of pressure fluctuations is below the typical free flow situation.

  
Figure 6.1: Comparison of the amplitude of normalized rms pressure fluctuations acting on the telescope top ring in different enclosure configurations.

The advantage of the open air enclosure is more evident if one compares the amplitude of pressure fluctuations with frequency larger than 1 Hz, which is a typical bandwidth of the closed loop control system of the telescope drives (fig. 6.2). The free flow wind contains very little turbulent energy at high frequencies, while a slit produces most of the flow turbulence right in that frequency range: only a 20% permeability wind screen can reduce the pressure fluctuations to the free flow level, by dramatically cutting the mean flow speed.

  
Figure 6.2: Amplitude of rms pressure fluctuations with frequency > 1 Hz, acting on the telescope top ring in different enclosures.



next up previous contents
Next: Wind buffeting on Up: Engineering criteria and Previous: Engineering criteria and



Lorenzo Zago, lorenzo.zago@heig-vd.ch, Mon Nov 6 23:33:14 GMT+0100 1995