next up previous contents
Next: References Up: Title Page Previous: Synthesis

Conclusions

We have described in this dissertation the main effects of the local atmospheric environment on the performance of an astronomical telescope and presented experimental databases, theoretical analysis and parameterizations which should contribute to establish the engineering of telescope enclosures on a more solid knowledge base.

Three main topics were studied:

  1. The characterization of the wind turbulence responsible for high frequency guiding errors
  2. The turbulent pressure fluctuations on the primary mirror
  3. The local seeing effects caused by the mirror, inside the enclosure and in the atmospheric surface layer
The table at page gif resumes the main results obtained and in particular the parameterizations relating the various local atmosphere effects to the telescope performance. The most significant and original results of this work are: The main driver for this work was the establishment of a set of useful engineering relationships applicable to the design of telescope enclosures, which has required in some cases simplifying approximations and generalizations. Therefore there is ample scope for deepening the analysis of several problems which have been treated here at a general level. In particular the following issues can be recommended as the object of further research work, whereby each subject could well constitute the topic of a separate dissertation:
  1. A more extensive and detailed analysis of the optical aberrations caused by wind buffeting on a large mirror.
  2. The analysis of the mirror seeing effect with respect to both spatial and temporal frequencies.

    Both subjects would be particularly important in the development of extended active and adaptive optics systems.

  3. The application of numerical CFD models in the design of astronomical observatories, comprehending all aerodynamic, thermal and seeing aspects in one computational model.
  4. The study of the various similarity scales applicable to local seeing effects and the use of reduced scale tests in the engineering of astronomical observatories.
Looking from a wider perspective angle, we will however note that the new knowledge elements brought here, as well as the ones that may come from a deeper insight of the various aspects of the telescope/environment interaction, will not by themselves make the design process of astronomical observatory more straightforward. Rather, they quantify more accurately a set of requirements that remain contradictory (e.g. the wind-versus-seeing dilemma mentioned in the introduction and throughout chapter gif). As these knowledge gaps are overcome, the engineering of telescope enclosures shall also tend to a better structured process of concurrent engineering, in which there is a larger scope for the system analysis and the optimization of the overall performance of the telescope+enclosure combination, as we have illustrated in chapter gif.

In absolute terms, the optimal enclosure without local seeing can only be made for an outstanding telescope, possibly still better than allowed by the present state of the art, at least when large 8-m telescopes are concerned. Essentially this better telescope should have a primary mirror designed to sustain a turbulent wind flow of at least 3-4 m/s and a guiding accuracy better than 0.05 arcsec with the top ring in open air. In such conditions the best enclosure will be represented ultimately by the retractable dome illustrated in fig. gif.

Yet, even within the limits of the present state of the art, it is possible to improve the quality of the engineering of astronomical observatories by including in the development phase also all operational aspects of astronomical observations. We have mentioned in chapter gif the random nature of the influence of local atmospheric turbulence and how these effects interact with the variability of the natural seeing and with an also random distribution of telescope orientations. We have used these considerations to propose a statistical approach for the performance assessment. In fact one may envisage a few steps further in that direction.

Not all types of observations require the best image quality but some can only be made if this is outstanding. This consideration has already prompted the idea of a flexible scheduling of observations as a function of the natural seeing conditions. We can envisage to extend the scope of flexible scheduling to take into account in a more comprehensive manner all the local parameters contributing to the image quality, such as the actual wind loading on the telescope observing any given sky object and mirror seeing predicted by processing the information on the respective temperature evolutions for mirror and ambient air. This approach emphasizes the importance of having reliable parameterizations for all the environment dependent error sources, which has been a main objective of this work. Indeed this will allow the observatory to predict and evaluate the overall image quality for any option in the observation program and therefore to schedule it appropriately for optimized observations.

For example, recalling from chapter gif that the mechanical turbulence on the telescope will be stronger when the slit azimuth is between 15 and 40 from the average wind direction, there will be only two ranges in azimuth, for a total of 50 on 360 which will generally be critical for guiding errors. Therefore it is certainly possible to avoid the critical range simply by choosing an appropriate observation timing. Similar reasoning can be applied to all other effects and, with the help of the parameterizations provided by the present work, lead to develop the criteria for an optimized scheduling of the observations as a main part of the general design of an astronomical observatory.



next up previous contents
Next: References Up: Title Page Previous: Synthesis



Lorenzo Zago, lorenzo.zago@heig-vd.ch, Mon Nov 6 23:33:14 GMT+0100 1995